Logo Huntington Discussion Board
  FAQ  |   Search  |   Memberlist  |   Usergroups  |   Profile  |   Log in to check your private messages  |   Log in  |  Register
  Washington Post negative comment about Huntington  Page 1 of 1 
 Current time: Sep 08, 2010 5:51 am  Reply to topic  
 Discussion Board Forum Index >  General Chat >  Washington Post negative comment about Huntington View previous topic | View next topic   
Author Message
  Post Posted: Jul 12, 2009 8:01 am    Post subject: Washington Post negative comment about Huntington Reply with quote  
 MichaelA
 
 

 Joined: 03 Apr 2006
 Posts: 10
 

On July 5, the Post ran an article that asked if Fairfax County should become a city rather than a county. The article said that Fairfax is a rich county with a few blighted areas like Huntington and Kings Park. This was an unfair slap. Kings Park wrote back.

Letter to the editors of the Post:

Kings Park Is Just Fine

Sunday, July 12, 2009

The July 5 front-page story "To Be or Not to Be Fairfax County?" said: "Old neighborhoods such as Kings Park along Braddock Road or Huntington along Route 1 have been struggling with decline. Unkempt rented homes and falling property values dot these landscapes."

I object to that characterization of Kings Park. Just because the homes are around 50 years old doesn't mean that people here don't care about the neighborhood and are letting it decay. To the contrary, residents are clearly involved.

The Kings Park Civic Association organizes many events throughout the year and works closely with the police department in our Neighborhood Watch program. Our recent Fourth of July parade was well attended and concluded with a lovely concert by our Kings Park Concert Band. More than 500 people turned out for our annual spring potluck this year.

Yes, a handful of folks need to take better care of their homes, but any drive through Kings Park will show that the vast majority of residents take care of their properties. Moreover, my fiance and I spend hundreds of hours (and dollars) mowing, trimming, mulching and planting, and I defy you to look at our place and be able to tell whether we own it or not. The article's inference that all renters are slovenly was uncalled for.

JOHN FIGLEAR

Springfield  
_________________
MichaelA
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailto topto bottom
  Post Posted: Nov 29, 2009 10:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  
 HuntingtonRay
 Site Admin
 

 Joined: 09 Mar 2006
 Posts: 54
 Location: Fifer Drive

My experience is that part of the problem in Huntington is Fairfax County itself due to its lax enforcement.

A slumlord who owns three rentals on my street bought a fourth a few years back. While working outside readying the house for rental, I went up and asked if business was good since he found enough money to purchase another house. He said no; he had sold a house in Del Ray, City of Alexandria. He complained that due to the city's constant stream of citations for property maintenance issued to him, he decided to sell and bought another house in Fairfax County with the money. He mentioned broken glass in window, falling fence, and paint. He thought that since he did not break the fence, he should not be responsible for repairing it.

The message I took away was that the City of Alexandria enforces property maintenance regulations, but Fairfax County does not, and therefore is a safe haven for slumlords.

On my street, we have two houses with illegal apartments in basements; more than one family living in a single family house. Each house generates several cans of trash each week, and due to the excessive number of cars for the extra families, is now starting to create a shortage of street parking. If this problem is multiplied, it could be one cause for the overcrowding in our schools, and why the school district population forecasts have been so far off.

Poor county enforcement of regulations in Huntington only reinforces the degradation of our neighborhood, and probably other neighborhoods as well. This encourages good residents to move out, and discourages good residents from moving in.  
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailVisit poster's websiteAIM Addressto topto bottom
  Post Posted: Dec 03, 2009 10:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  
 jason4424
 
 

 Joined: 19 Mar 2007
 Posts: 7
 

HuntingtonRay wrote:
My experience is that part of the problem in Huntington is Fairfax County itself due to its lax enforcement.

A slumlord who owns three rentals on my street bought a fourth a few years back. While working outside readying the house for rental, I went up and asked if business was good since he found enough money to purchase another house. He said no; he had sold a house in Del Ray, City of Alexandria. He complained that due to the city's constant stream of citations for property maintenance issued to him, he decided to sell and bought another house in Fairfax County with the money. He mentioned broken glass in window, falling fence, and paint. He thought that since he did not break the fence, he should not be responsible for repairing it.

The message I took away was that the City of Alexandria enforces property maintenance regulations, but Fairfax County does not, and therefore is a safe haven for slumlords.

On my street, we have two houses with illegal apartments in basements; more than one family living in a single family house. Each house generates several cans of trash each week, and due to the excessive number of cars for the extra families, is now starting to create a shortage of street parking. If this problem is multiplied, it could be one cause for the overcrowding in our schools, and why the school district population forecasts have been so far off.

Poor county enforcement of regulations in Huntington only reinforces the degradation of our neighborhood, and probably other neighborhoods as well. This encourages good residents to move out, and discourages good residents from moving in.


I'd be willing to bet that all the County cares about at this point when it comes to Huntington is that it doesn't flood again any time soon. Other than that, they're not about to expend additional resources to enforce such codes. Throw in the down economy, and they're definitely not. Of course, they likely wouldn't do it in good economic times either, so that would be just a convenient excuse.  
 
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mailto topto bottom
Display posts from previous:   
Jump to:  
   
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 All times are GMT - 6 Hours  
 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group